Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
Users Online: 737
Home Print this page Email this page

 



 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Edu Health Promot 2023,  12:72

Medical students' perceptions of the educational environment in a private medical school in southwest Nigeria


Department of Medicine, Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria

Date of Submission10-Jul-2022
Date of Acceptance10-Oct-2022
Date of Web Publication28-Feb-2023

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Oluwatosin O Oguntoye
Department of Medicine, Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_987_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


BACKGROUND: The educational environment plays a very important role in determining the overall performance of students. The aim of this study is to determine the perceptions of undergraduate medical students about their educational environment in a Nigerian university.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional study conducted among final-year (600 level) undergraduate medical students. The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaire was used for the study to assess the educational environment of the medical students.
RESULTS: A total number of 100 final-year (600 level) undergraduate medical students participated in the study, out of which 27 (27.0%) were males and 73 (73.0%) were females with a male-to-female ratio of 0.37 to 1. The age range of the respondents was 21–30 years with a mean (±SD) of 23.54 (±1.403). The total mean DREEM score was 116.2/200. The total score of SPL domain was 30.2/48 (62.9%). The total score of SPT domain was 27.3/44 (62.0%), while that of SASP was 19.2/32 (60.0%). The total score of SPA domain was 26.6/48 (55.4%) and that of SSP was 13.1/28 (46.8%). For the SPL, SPT, SASP, and SPA domains, the score was above 50%. However, for the SSP domain the score was less than 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: The total mean DREEM score in this study was 116.2/200, more positives than negatives, with the students' social perspective having the least domain score. There is a need to provide adequate social support system for medical students in general and particularly for those who get stressed.

Keywords: Educational environment, measurement, medical students, Nigeria, perception


How to cite this article:
Oguntoye OO. Medical students' perceptions of the educational environment in a private medical school in southwest Nigeria. J Edu Health Promot 2023;12:72

How to cite this URL:
Oguntoye OO. Medical students' perceptions of the educational environment in a private medical school in southwest Nigeria. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 24];12:72. Available from: https://www.jehp.net//text.asp?2023/12/1/72/370586




  Introduction Top


The educational environment plays a very important role in determining the overall performance of students.[1] Institutions therefore must pay adequate attention to their educational environment. Some of the indicators of a healthy educational environment include improved students' academic performance, increased motivation among students, positive institutional profile, higher staff morale, and higher quality teaching.[2]

The medical curriculum is quite wide and highly challenging to medical students as a large amount of information need to be learned, within a specified period, which thus puts an enormous academic burden on the students.[3] There is therefore a need for medical students to learn in a conducive educational environment that would enable them to adequately learn all that is required of them and ensure a good academic performance. Medical students' educational environment has a major implication on their quality of learning and academic success.[1]

Studies have been done in different parts of the world on measurement of the educational environment with varied reports, many of which had more positives than negatives.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] There is however paucity of data on the assessment of the educational environment in Nigerian tertiary institutions, hence this study. The objective of this study is to determine the perceptions of undergraduate medical students about their educational environment in a Nigerian university.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study design

This was an observational, cross-sectional study.

Study participant and sampling

The study was conducted among the final-year (600 level) undergraduate medical students in a private medical school in southwestern Nigeria. The medical school is accredited by the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria and the Nigerian University Commission. The number of undergraduate medical students in the final-year class (600 level) of the medical school is 104, and 100 of them consented to participate in the study giving a response rate of 96.1%.

Data collection tool and technique

The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaire was used in this study for the data collection. The DREEM questionnaire is a well-validated tool originally designed to measure the educational environment specifically for medical schools and other health professions (Roff et al. 1997).[10] The DREEM questionnaire contains 50 statements relating to a range of topics directly relevant to educational environment. DREEM has five subscales, namely Students' Perceptions of Learning (SPL), Students' Perceptions of Teachers (SPT), Students' Academic Self Perceptions (SASP), Students' Perceptions of Atmosphere (SPA), and Students' Social self-Perceptions (SSP).

Scoring the DREEM Questionnaire

Scoring system of the DREEM questionnaire was the one suggested by McAleer and Roff.[11] Each of the 50 DREEM items was scored from 0 to 4. Assignment for the scores was 0 (strongly disagree—SD), 1 (disagree—D), 2 (uncertain—U), 3 (agree—A), and 4 (strongly agree—SA). However, 9 of the 50 items (numbers 4, 8, 9, 17, 25, 35, 39, 48, and 50) were negative statements and asked to be scored in the reverse manner (0 for SA, 1 for A, 2 for U, 3 for D, and 4 for SD). The maximum score obtainable is 200.

Scores in the range of 151–200 are viewed as excellent; 101–150 are viewed as more positive than negative; 51–100 indicate plenty of problems, while 0–50 indicate a very poor score [Table 1].
Table 1: Guide for overall DREEM score interpretation

Click here to view


The subscales are as follows: Students' Perceptions of Learning (SPL)—containing 12 items with a maximum score of 48, Students' Perceptions of Teachers (SPT)—containing 11 items with a maximum score of 44, Students' Academic Self Perceptions (SASP)—containing 8 items with a maximum score of 32, Students' Perceptions of Atmosphere (SPA)—containing 12 items with a maximum score of 48, and Students' Social self-Perceptions (SSP)—containing 7 items with a maximum score of 28 [Table 2].
Table 2: Guide for DREEM domain score interpretation

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

The data obtained was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 computer software package for Windows® (SPSS Chicago Inc. IL, USA). Descriptive statistics used included frequency tables, means, and standard deviations. The standard scoring procedures for the DREEM questionnaire were used to determine the total mean score and the subscale/domain scores.

Ethical consideration

The study was done in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki version 2013. Informed consent was obtained from the study participants, and the identity of the participants was not disclosed.


  Results Top


A total number of 100 final-year (600 level) undergraduate medical students participated in the study, out of which 27 (27.0%) were males and 73 (73.0%) were females with a male-to-female ratio of 0.37 to 1 [Table 3]. The age range of the respondents was 21–30 years with a mean (±SD) of 23.54 (±1.403).
Table 3: Age and gender distribution of the final-year medical students

Click here to view


The total mean score of DREEM in this study was 116.2/200 (58.1%) [Table 4]. The total score of each of the five subscales of the DREEM questionnaire is as shown in [Table 4].
Table 4: Mean scores of the DREEM domains

Click here to view


The total score of SPL domain was 30.2/48 (62.9%). The total score of SPT domain was 27.3/44 (62.0%), while that of SASP was 19.2/32 (60.0%). The total score of SPA domain was 26.6/48 (55.4%) and that of SSP was 13.1/28 (46.8%). For SPL, SPT, SASP, and SPA domains, the score was above 50%. However, for SSP domain the score was below 50%.

The scores for each individual item in each domain are as shown in [Table 5].
Table 5: Mean scores of the items in each DREEM domain

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


This study was conducted to determine medical students' perception of their educational environment at a private medical school in southwest Nigeria using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) instrument.[10]

The response rate in this study was quite high (96.1%), and this gives validity to the results obtained from this study as being truly representative. In this study, the total number of females in the final-year class was significantly higher than that of males with a ratio of 1 to 0.37. This is in contrast to the finding in other Nigerian medical schools in which males were much more than females.[12],[13]

The mean age of the final year medical students in this study is also much lesser than that of other studies.[12],[13] This could be due to the fact that this study was conducted among students attending a private medical school where the academic calendar and curriculum is strictly followed without interruptions unlike public universities where students spend more years in their programs of study due to frequent disruptions in the academic program as a result of various reasons.

The total mean DREEM score and the individual mean domain scores recorded in this study are very good when compared with other similar studies both locally and internationally. In this study, the total mean DREEM score was 116.2/200, and it corresponds to “more positive than negative” perspective. This DREEM score is higher than what was reported in similar studies conducted by Thomas et al.[4] in India, Al-Qahtani[5] in Saudi Arabia, Hettie[6] in Canada, and Bassaw et al.[7] in West Indies. The DREEM score in this study is higher possibly due to the study being conducted in a private medical school as against government-owned public medical schools where the other studies were conducted. Government-owned public medical schools in Nigeria known to have various challenges however may not score as well. Nevertheless, the score of this study is less than that reported by Edgren et al.[8] in Sweden and Denz – Penhey et al.[9] in Australia.

In a study by Idon et al.[14] on the perceptions of dental students on the educational environment in a new dental school in Maiduguri, Nigeria, the total mean DREEM score was 138.2/200 which is higher than that of this study. This could be due to the fact that the dental school is still new with new functional facilities. Continuous optimal maintenance of facilities is still a challenge in Nigeria.

In a similar study by Aneela et al.[15] among medical and dental students in Pakistan, the total mean DREEM score was 112/200 which is less than that of this study, and Noreen et al.[16] in another medical school in Pakistan reported even a much lesser mean DREEM score of 107.5/200. This shows that even within the same country, institutions can have DREEM scores that are widely apart. What is important is to identify the domains with low scores and address the factors responsible.

The DREEM tool which is well standardized and validated provides a true objective measurement of the educational environment regardless of the level of development of the nation in which it was deployed. The differences in the individual domain scores are responsible for the varied total mean scores reported by the various studies. Hence, specific measures can be deployed by institutions to improve the affected domains with low scores.

In this study, the Students' Social self-Perceptions (SSP) had the least mean domain score of less than 50%. This reduced score contributed largely to the average total mean score observed in this study. The score was reduced in virtually all the individual items that make up the SSP domain. These items are the social factors that define the social environment of the students. The inadequate social support identified by this study includes inadequate support system for students who get stressed, excessive fatigue which makes studying less enjoyable, boredom while going through the course, inadequate personal and interpersonal social life and loneliness during the course.

The Students' Perceptions of Atmosphere (SPA) scored less (55.4%) when compared to the other domains. This reduced score also contributed to the average total mean score observed in this study. The score was reduced in some of the items that make up the SPA domain. These items are the factors that define the learning atmosphere of the students. The inadequate learning atmosphere identified by this study include inadequate learning experience, tensed learning atmosphere during seminars, tutorials and ward teachings, improper course timetable, and inadequate opportunities to develop interpersonal skills.

The Students' Academic Self Perceptions (SASP) scored relatively well in this study. The factors responsible for the score in the SASP domain include inadequate knowledge of scientific research, reduced retentive memory, and improper learning strategies of the students.

The mean scores obtained in the SPL and SPT domains are relatively good when compared with other studies. Teachers' feedback to students and behavior of the teachers against the students are some of the factors responsible for the above average mean score observed in the SPT domain. Teaching being less student-centered is one the factors responsible for the above average mean score observed in the SPL domain.

Appropriate and specific measures must be taken in order to address all these identified factors that are responsible for the average mean score recorded in each of the domains in this study. This would resultantly improve on the overall total mean DREEM score as a measure of an improved educational environment of the medical school.

There is a need to regularly review the undergraduate medical curriculum and course timetables in an innovative manner that would not overburden the medical students with excessive course load which is responsible for the stress, fatigue and poor social life that were identified in this study. There is a need to have a social and welfare unit in the medical school that would be saddled with the responsibility of ensuring that the social and welfare needs of the students are taken care of. Such needs would include improvement on the available accommodation facilities and provision of adequate support system to students who get stressed.

A relaxing, friendly, and comfortable learning atmosphere should be made available to medical students during classroom teachings, seminars, tutorials, clinical or practical demonstrations, and during ward teachings. A tensed atmosphere should be avoided at all times. This would make the learning experience of the medical students much more enjoyable and has the potential to improve their leaning and academic performance.

Adequate study guidance should be provided for medical students throughout their medical school training; this would help the students to adopt an appropriate study style and learning approach which has the potential to improve learning, enhance memory, and improve academic performance. Medical students should also be exposed early to scientific research which will give them the necessary foundational knowledge upon which they would continue to build. Mentorship of medical students by senior faculty members should be encouraged.

Teachers should regularly have a continuous professional development training which will keep them updated and ensure that quality teaching is delivered. Appropriate official feedback mechanism should be instituted to facilitate communication between the students and the teachers. This would create an avenue for students with academic deficiencies to get the needed help. Avenues should also be created for students to lodge official complaints on any lecturer found wanting and vice versa. These checks and balances would improve the learning environment of the students.

This study has provided the much-needed information about the educational environment in a medical school in Nigeria. It has provided scientific data and needed information that can be utilized by medical school administrators, deans, student counselors, and lecturers/teachers on the educational environment of the medical school and specific measures that can be instituted to improve it. Implementation of such measures would ensure adequate learning and enhance better academic performance of the students. The findings in this study can help to stimulate further interest and research on this topic in medical schools across Nigeria.


  Conclusion Top


The total mean DREEM score in this study was 116.2/200, more positives than negatives, with the Students' Social self-Perceptions having the least mean domain score followed by the students' perceptions of atmosphere. There is a need therefore to provide adequate social and welfare support system for medical students in general and particularly for those who get stressed. A relaxing, non-tensed, friendly, and comfortable learning atmosphere should also be always made available to medical students during teachings. This would make the learning experience of the medical students much more enjoyable and has the potential to improve their leaning and academic performance.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the House Officers and Resident Doctors in the Department of Medicine for their support in making this publication a reality.

Previous publication

The author confirms that the article is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Ethical statement

A written informed consent was obtained from the study participants, and the identity of participants was not revealed at any stage of the study conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki version 2013. An Ethical Approval was obtained from the Ethics and Research Committee of the institution.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Roff S. The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) – A generic instrument for measuring students' perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula. Med Teach 2005;27:322-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Cross V, Hicks C, Parle J, Field S. Perceptions of the learning environment in higher specialist training of doctors: Implications for recruitment and retention. Med Educ 2006;40:121-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Thomas P, Kern D, Hughes M, Chen B. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. 3rd ed. Maryland, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Thomas BS, Abraham RR, Alexander M, Ramnarayan K. Student's perception regarding educational environment in an India dental school. Med Teach 2009;31:e185-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Al-Qahtani MF. Approaches to study and learning environment in medical school with special reference to the gulf countries. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing. University of Dundee. Education for Health 17. p. 192-203.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Hettie T. Identifying the perceived weakness of a new curriculum by means of Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) inventory. Med Tech 2004;26:39-45.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bassaw B, Roff S, McAleer S, Roopnamesingh S, De Lisile J, Teelucksingh S, et al. Student's perspectives of the educational environment, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Trinidad. Med Tech 2003;25:522-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Edgren G, Haffling A, Jakobsson U, McAleer S, Danielsen N. Comparing the educational environment (as measured by DREEM) at two different stages of curricular reform. Med Tech 2010;32:e232-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Denz – Penhey H, Murdoch JC. A comparison between findings from DREEM questionnaire and that from qualitative interviews. Med Teach 2009;31:e449-53.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Roff S, McAleer S, Harden RM, Al-Qahtani M, Ahmed AU, Deza H, et al. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment measure (DREEM). Med Teach 1997;19:295-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
McAleer S, Roff S. A practical guide to using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). AMEE Medical Education Guide 2001;23:29-33.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ossai EN, Uwakwe KA, Anyanwagu UC, Ibiok NC, Azuogu BN, Ekeke N. Specialty preferences among final year medical students in medical schools of southeast Nigeria: need for career guidance. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:259.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Adeleye OA, Eza G. Anticipated specialties and influencing factors among final year medical students in a Nigerian University. J Med Sci 2010;26:510-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Idon PI, Suleiman IK, Olasoji HO. Students' perceptions of the educational environment in a new dental school in northern Nigeria. Jo Educ Pract 2015;6:139-47.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Aneela U, Sadia K, Musarrat-ul-H., Sumaira I. Educational environment at University Medical and Dental College, FSD. Annals 2011;17:292-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Noreen K, Khan KA, Nehra RA. Students' perception of learning environment using Dundee ready education environment measure (DREEM) inventory. Pak J Public Health 2018;8:112-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed126    
    Printed28    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal