Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
Users Online: 6277
Home Print this page Email this page

 



 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Edu Health Promot 2022,  11:179

The correlates of physical activity during COVID-19 pandemic among Indonesian young adults: A longitudinal study


Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Date of Submission19-May-2021
Date of Acceptance03-Jan-2022
Date of Web Publication11-Jun-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Novita Intan Arovah
Faculty of Sports Science, Yogyakarta State University, Colombo Street No 1, Karang Malang, Yogyakarta 55281
Indonesia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_720_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


BACKGROUND: Social distancing policy during the COVID-19 pandemic may affect physical activity levels. This study aimed to compare physical activity levels before and during the pandemic and to explore physical activity correlates among Indonesian young adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal study was conducted before the pandemic (n = 141) in September 2019 and was followed by an online follow-up survey during the pandemic (79% response rate) in September 2020. Physical activity was measured using the global physical activity questionnaire and was classified into “sufficient” and “insufficient.” The potential correlates of physical activity were constructs from social-cognitive theory and health belief model. Those were measured using a validated questionnaire in the follow-up survey. Physical activity levels before and during pandemics were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Simple logistic regressions were used to assess the relationships between each potential correlate and physical activity status during the pandemic.
RESULTS: Physical activity levels decreased significantly during the pandemic, mostly in the work-related domain. Participants with favorable physical activity-related constructs were more likely to be physically active. The odds ratio ranged from 3.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15–10.11) in participants with higher self-efficacy to 4.50 (95% CI = 1.44–14.06) in those with higher outcome expectations of physical activity.
CONCLUSION: A significant decline in physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic among Indonesian young adults was confirmed. The application of behavioral change theories for explaining physical activity status during the pandemic in this population is also supported. It is recommended to incorporate these constructs to develop physical activity interventions in this target population.

Keywords: Association, COVID-19, exercise, health belief model


How to cite this article:
Arovah NI. The correlates of physical activity during COVID-19 pandemic among Indonesian young adults: A longitudinal study. J Edu Health Promot 2022;11:179

How to cite this URL:
Arovah NI. The correlates of physical activity during COVID-19 pandemic among Indonesian young adults: A longitudinal study. J Edu Health Promot [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 2];11:179. Available from: http://www.https://jehp.net//text.asp?2022/11/1/179/347183




  Introduction Top


Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), due to its relatively high transmission and high case fatality rates which are mostly associated with respiratory distress[1] or coagulopathy,[2] has caused significant health, social, and economic burden worldwide,[3],[4] including in Indonesia.[5] While several countries have contained the transmission rate,[6],[7] COVID-19 cases are continually increasing in Indonesia.[8] Preventive measures which include social restriction, thus, are still heavily imposed in Indonesia.[9] Consequently, it affects various sectors of life including the economy,[10] transportation,[11] social,[12] culture,[10] and education system in Indonesia.[13]

Although the social restriction policy is intended to minimize the spread of COVID-19, it potentially reduces individuals' opportunities to be physically active.[14] It is unfortunate because the decline of physical activity could result in adverse effects on the immune system.[15] In contrast, a growing body of evidence has stated that moderate-to-vigorous- physical activity (MVPA) increases the antipathogenic activity of tissue macrophages, immunoglobulins, anti-inflammatory cytokines, neutrophils, natural killer cells, cytotoxic T-cells, and B-cells.[16],[17] Thus, MVPA increases the body's resistance to bacterial and viral infections.[16] In addition, it also reduces cortisol, a stress hormone that can suppress immune cell function,[18] improves metabolic parameters,[19] improves bioenergetics,[20] and reduces systemic inflammations.[21],[22] All of which play an important role in boosting the immune system[23] which further plays significant roles in controlling COVID-19 transmission. Moreover, individuals who were consistently meeting physical activity recommendations experience reduced risks for severe COVID-19 complications when they are infected with the coronavirus,[24] which is associated with an increase in quality of life.[25] Thus, in addition to the social restriction policy, physical activity promotion needs to be emphasized as a significant public health agenda during the COVID-19 pandemic to curb both the COVID-19 transmission and case fatality rates.

The development of physical activity interventions requires an understanding of factors that influence physical activity behaviors.[26] Studies which have conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic have shown that physical activity behaviors could be explained using behavior change theories such as the social-cognitive theory (SCT) and health belief model (HBM).[27] Those theories also have been used as frameworks for developing effective physical activity interventions pre COVID-19 pandemic,[28],[29] and understanding overall COVID-19 preventive behavior during the pandemic.[30],[31] The SCT is operated within several main constructs such as self-efficacy, outcome expectation, social supports, and self-regulation.[26] These constructs have been found useful in explaining and predicting physical activity behavior.[32],[33] Meanwhile, the HBM is potentially useful in explaining physical activity behaviors during the pandemic using the HBM's main constructs, which are the perceived susceptibility and severity of health consequences of physical inactivity as well as the perceived benefit and barriers of physical activity.[26]

While the association between the SCT and HBM constructs and physical activity behavior in the general population has been established before the COVID-19 pandemic,[14],[34] it is unknown to what extent those constructs influence physical activity behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic among young adults that were previously physically active (i.e., sports science students) in Indonesia. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their physical activity levels also has not been evaluated considering that they were heavily affected by the social restriction policy which has left them with fewer opportunities to be physically active during the class hours caused by the fully online learning education mode and the halts of many sporting events. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the trend of physical activity before and during the pandemic and to evaluate the relationship between constructs from behavioral change theories (i.e., SCT and HBM) and physical activity behaviors in this target population. It is expected that the findings of this study would inform the policymakers for providing them with adequate support for maintaining their physical activity levels by developing physical activity intervention that best suits this target population.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study design and setting

This study was a longitudinal physical activity survey that compared physical activity levels before and during pandemic among students in a Sports Science Faculty in Indonesia. The first survey was conducted on-site in September 2019. The second survey was an online follow-up survey that was conducted in September 2020, during the university closure and fully online learning.

Study participants and sampling

The participants were students in a Sports Science Faculty in Indonesia who participated in a physical activity survey recruited through convenience sampling. They were then invited a year later invited to participate in an online follow-up study. Those responding to the follow-up survey were included in the final analysis.

Data collection tool and technique

The first survey was a paper-based survey assessing participants' physical activity levels, social demography, and anthropometric data. The follow-up survey was an online survey assessing the participants' physical activity levels and potential social-cognitive factors based on the SCT and HBM constructs.

Physical activity

The physical activity level and status were assessed in 2019 and 2020 using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). This questionnaire has been developed by the WHO for surveillance of physical activity in various countries.[35] The GPAQ was used in this study because it has been validated in adult populations in nine countries and has demonstrated adequate reliability with coefficients (kappa) of 0.67–0.73 and Spearman rho 0.67–0.81.[36] Although the concurrent validity with the pedometer was 0.35,[36] the GPAQ is a globally accepted physical activity measure. It consists of 16 items related to work, active travel, recreational-related physical activity, and sedentary behavior.[35]

The total metabolic equivalent of task (MET) per week in three domains (work, active travel, and recreational) was calculated according to the standard GPAQ scoring. To create the total Mets per week, the time spent in walking, cycling, or moderate physical activity was multiplied by 4 and was added up with the time spent in strenuous activities which were multiplied by 8. Mets per week were also calculated for each physical activity domain. Based on the scoring guideline, we used three criteria to classify participants as 'insufficiently” active, which were (i) participants who did not meet the threshold of physical activity recommendations of ≥600 METs per week, (ii) participants who engaged in <5 days of MVPA per week, or (iii) participants who accumulated less than 150 MVPA minutes per week.[35] Otherwise, participants were classified as “sufficiently” active.

Potential correlates

The social-cognitive correlates were assessed through an online questionnaire which was sent to the participants' registered students' e-mail along with the informed consent in the second survey during the pandemic. The potential correlates were adapted from instruments from constructs from the SCT and the HBM. Self-efficacy in this regard was defined as an individual's perceived ability in engaging insufficient physical activity regardless of barriers they experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, while outcome expectation was construed as individuals' perception of the likelihood and importance of outcomes resulted in being physically active related to COVID-19.[32] Meanwhile, social support was interpreted as individuals' opportunities to receive support from their family and friends to become physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic, and self-regulation was defined as individuals' ability to regulate their behavior to become physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic.[32] The perceived severity and susceptibility were related to their health risks associated with COVID-19 infection, while perceived benefits and barriers were concerning on their perception of being physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic.[37] [Table 1] further summarizes and defines potential correlates of physical activity behaviors.
Table 1: Social-cognitive correlates of physical activity behavior

Click here to view


To minimalize the response load and thus to increase the participation rate, all potential correlates were asked with a single item with dichotomous responses. The content validity of the questionnaires was previously examined by six specialists in education and health promotion. Based on the recommended procedure,[38] each expert was asked to rate each item based on two criteria: (1) the relevance of the question to the instrument objective and local culture and (2) the clarity and equivalence of phrasing. The ratings used were on a 4-point Likert scale (i.e., 1 = not relevant or equivalent, 2 = somewhat relevant or equivalent, 3 = almost relevant or equivalent and 4 = very relevant or equivalent). The proportion of experts who gave each item a rating of 3 or 4 for content validity for each item were calculated to determine the item's content validity index (I-CVI). An I-CVI of 0.78 or above was the minimum acceptable index for each of the questionnaire items.[38] The content validity index for all items that assessed potential correlates for physical activity behaviors ranged between 0.83 and 1.

Social demography characteristics and anthropometry measurement

The data on age, sex, height, and weight were collected during the first survey. Height was measured using a stadiometer, while weight was measured using a standardized scale.

Ethical consideration

All participants were provided with informed consent and the study protocol was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Gadjah Mada University (approval No. KE/0142/02/2019 and No. KE/0523/06/2020).

Data analysis plan

Sociodemographic, anthropometric data and physical activity levels were compared between participants responding to the follow-up survey and participants who were lost to follow-up using Mann–Whitney to account for the nonnormality of the data. Sociodemographic data were also compared between participants with sufficient and insufficient physical activity status based on the second survey. Physical activity levels (i.e., total, work-related, transport-related, and recreational physical activity) were compared between the first survey (before pandemic) and the second survey (during the pandemic) using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test due to the nonnormality of the data. Simple logistic regressions were carried out to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of each potential correlate in engaging with sufficient physical activity, unadjusted for sex and age since these were not found in association with physical activity status. SPSS® v25.0 was used to analyze the data (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, US). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.


  Results Top


Participants social demographic characteristics

The study participants in the first physical activity survey were 141 students. One hundred eleven (79%) of those responded to the second survey. The characteristics of participants who were recruited in the follow-up study and the characteristics of the participants who did not respond (lost to follow-up) are shown in [Table 2]. In general, the majority of participants in both the baseline and follow-up studies were male (77.3% and 74.8%). There was no difference in social demography, anthropometry, and physical activity levels between participants participating in the follow-up study and those who were lost to follow-up.
Table 2: Description of sociodemographic characteristics

Click here to view


Physical activity levels

[Figure 1] shows a comparison of physical activity levels before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among participants in the follow-up survey (n = 111). In the first survey, all participants met physical activity recommendations, while in the follow-up survey, 16 participants (11.3%) did not meet physical activity recommendations.
Figure 1: Comparisons of physical activity levels before and during pandemic in Mets per week (n = 111)

Click here to view


There was an overall decrease in total physical activity, with a median of 3960 and 1720 Mets/week before and during the pandemic (P < 0.001). The main decline occurred in the work-related domain (1920 ± 360 Mets/week, P < 0.001), while only slightly decreased in the transport domain (200 ± 180 Mets/week, P = 0.002) and the recreational domain (1320 ± 1120 Mets/week, P = 0.295).

Correlates of physical activity

[Table 3] summarizes the ORs of the potential correlates in predicting the likelihood of engaging insufficient physical activity level during the COVID-19 pandemic. As seen in the table, age and sex did not correlate with physical activity status. Those with favorable social-cognitive factors related to physical activity were approximately 3–4 times more likely to engage be physically active. Meanwhile, those with higher perceived barriers of being physically active were 0.3 less likely (95% confidence interval; 0.10–0.89) to engage in sufficient physical activity.
Table 3: Correlates of physical activity status (n=111)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


While few studies have assessed physical activity levels in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic,[39],[40] to our knowledge, this study is the first longitudinal study comparing the physical activity levels before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among previously active young adults in Indonesia. We found that physical activity levels decreased significantly during the pandemic. Our findings were in corroboration with studies that reported a decline in physical activity level in the general population in the UK,[41] in Australian college students,[42] in adolescences in Bosnia and Herzegovina,[43] and among previously physically active young adults in Canada.[44]

The decline in physical activity levels in our study participants was also in line with a recent study reporting an overall global physical activity level decrease which was based on the data from smartphone step counter applications from users around the world.[34] That study also found that even countries which had relatively low COVID-19 infection rates and have therefore do not imposed lockdowns, such as South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan, also exhibited decreases in overall step counts.[34] That study, though, did not include data from Indonesia and other southeast Asian regions; thus our study as well as other studies in Indonesia[39],[40] in part contributed to confirm the decrease of physical activity levels in this region during the COVID-19 pandemic.

We found that the decrease of physical activity levels in our study participants was mostly found within the work-related domain. It should be noted that the sporting activities conducted during school hours in our target population were classified into the work-related domain, thus this finding was expected. We also found that the recreational-related domain was relatively unchanged, while the transport-related domain slightly decreased. The findings could not be readily compared with findings from previous studies since those studies measured total physical activity and did not report which physical activity domains that were affected by the decline.[34],[41],[42],[44] The finding of this study thus could inform policymakers to tailor the physical activity intervention in the appropriate physical activity domain.

To be noted, in the light of the global physical activity level decrease, the physical activity reduction trends among countries were varied.[34] It may reflect variation in COVID-19 cases and regional policies in particularly social distancing measures over time. Even so, it was shown that fluctuation in physical activity levels during the study period in all observed countries occurred when there were no regulatory changes that affect engaging in physical activity within a region.[34]

We also found higher physical activity variability during COVID-19 pandemic compared to before pandemic in our study participants. There were participants who were able to maintain or even increase their physical activity levels during pandemic, while the others experienced decreases in their physical activity levels during the pandemic. The variability may reflect differences in social-cognitive processes among our participants, particularly on how they perceived COVID-19, the social restriction policy, and the roles of physical activity in protecting their health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, it is essential to assess the relationship between these social-cognitive process and physical activity behavior in this target population for characterizing participants who were more likely to engage in “sufficient” and “insufficient” physical activity.

Our study confirmed a significant association between constructs from SCT and HBM with physical activity status. The findings show that those with favorable attitudes and beliefs toward physical activity and COVID-19 were more likely to engage in sufficient physical activity levels. Previous studies have established the use of these constructs in explaining physical activity status among the general population.[33],[45] Meta-analyses have revealed that 33% and 48% of the variance, respectively, for physical activity and intention were explained by social-cognitive models which include social-cognitive theories and HBM.[45] The finding in our study is consistent with studies which were conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic, in older adults,[46] mid-aged adults,[46],[47] and adolescence,[47],[48] which found both direct and indirect association between self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, perceived barriers, and self-regulation with physical activity behaviors.

While few studies have explored the use of the self-determinant theory[49] and the theory of planned behavior[50] as frameworks for modeling physical activity behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, an exploration of constructs from the SCT and HBM as physical activity correlates during COVID-19 pandemic have been limited. A study in Netherland which was conducted among the general population showed a positive and significant association between physical activity and self-efficacy, while the change in vigorous physical activity was negatively and significantly associated with perceived vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic.[51] Our study also found that higher self-efficacy, outcome expectation, social support, self-regulation, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and perceived benefits were positively associated with physical activity status in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings, thus, extend the applicability of these constructs for explaining physical activity behaviors among young adults who were previously physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia.

The main strength of our study is the use the longitudinal data which provided us with an opportunity to compare the physical activity levels before and during the pandemic. We also explored physical activity correlates based on established used behavioral change theories (i.e., SCT and HBM), which are commonly used as frameworks in explaining physical activity behavior as well as developing physical activity program. Our findings, thus, are comparable with other physical activity studies in the literature. However, several limitations were acknowledged. First, we did not measure potential physical activity correlates in the first survey, thus we could not compare the association of the behavioral change constructs with physical activity status across times. Second, due to the resource limitation, we used subjective physical activity measures as opposed to the objective physical activity measure such as accelerometer or pedometer. Thus, although the validity of the instrument has been established, the findings of our study are inherently limited by the nature of the subjective physical activity measure. Third, our study participants were young adults who were previously physically active. Thus, the findings from our study may not be able to be generalized in other demographics (i.e., children or older adults). This study, however, has provided much-needed data on this demographic since studies on young adults' physical activity correlates are scarce and that they usually receive fewer public health supports for improving physical activity levels.


  Conclusion Top


The decline of physical activity levels among young adults who were previously physically active in Indonesia was confirmed. Those with favorable attitudes and beliefs toward physical activity and COVID-19 were more likely to engage insufficient physical activity levels. It is recommended, thus, to develop physical activity intervention based on these constructs for improving physical activity levels in this target population. Future research involving time-series observations is recommended to capture changes in physical activity levels and assess their correlates. It is essential as COVID-19 policies may change across time due to changes in the COVID-19 epidemic. The findings of this study are expected to inform policymakers to develop physical activity interventions best suited to the target population.

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by an Unggulan Grant 2020 from the Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia. I would like to thank Prijo Sudibjo, Cerika Rismayanthi, Krisnanda Dwi Apriyanto, and students in the Sports Science Faculty Yogyakarta State University for their assistance with the data collection.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was funded by an Unggulan Grant 2020 from the Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
El-Solh AA, Meduri UG, Lawson Y, Carter M, Mergenhagen KA. Clinical course and outcome of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: Data from a National repository. J Intensive Care Med 2021;36:664-72.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
INSPIRATION Investigators; Sadeghipour P, Talasaz AH, Rashidi F, Sharif-Kashani B, Beigmohammadi MT, et al. Effect of intermediate-dose vs. standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation on thrombotic events, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment, or mortality among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit: The INSPIRATION randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;325:1620-30.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sarkodie SA, Owusu PA. Global assessment of environment, health and economic impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Environ Dev Sustain 2021; 23:5005–5015.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mofijur M, Fattah IM, Alam MA, Islam AB, Ong HC, Rahman SM, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on the social, economic, environmental and energy domains: Lessons learnt from a global pandemic. Sustain Prod Consum 2021;26:343-59.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Dwinantoaji H, Sumarni D. Human security, social stigma, and global health: The COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. J Med Sci (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran) 2020;52:158-165.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Xiao Y, Tang B, Wu J, Cheke RA, Tang S. Linking key intervention timing to rapid decline of the COVID-19 effective reproductive number to quantify lessons from mainland China. Int J Infect Dis 2020;97:296-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Baker MG, Wilson N, Anglemyer A. Successful Elimination of Covid-19 Transmission in New Zealand. N Engl J Med 2020;383:e56.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sari DK, Amelia R, Dharmajaya R, Sari LM, Fitri NK. Positive correlation between general public knowledge and attitudes regarding COVID-19 outbreak 1 month after first cases reported in Indonesia. J Community Health 2021;46:182-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Syuhada K, Wibisono A, Hakim A, Addini F. COVID-19 risk data during lockdown-like policy in Indonesia. Data Brief 2021;35:106801.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Rimbawati PR. Indonesia's Response to COVID-19: Between economics, public health, and social media. In: The Reshaping of China-Southeast Asia Relations in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Springer, Singapore; 2021. p. 137-65.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Irawan MZ, Belgiawan PF, Joewono TB, Bastarianto FF, Rizki M, Ilahi A. Exploring activity-travel behavior changes during the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Transportation (Amst) 2021:1-25.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Dwidienawati D, Tjahjana D, Pradipto YD, Gandasari D. The impact of mobility restriction on happiness and satisfaction in life during COVID-19 outbreak in Indonesia. Journal Of Southwest Jiaotong University 2021; 56:111-123  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Abidah A, Hidaayatullaah HN, Simamora RM, Fehabutar D, Mutakinati L. The impact of COVID-19 to Indonesian education and its relation to the philosophy of “Merdeka Belajar”. Stud Philos Sci Educ 2020;1:38-49.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Stockwell S, Trott M, Tully M, Shin J, Barnett Y, Butler L, et al. Changes in physical activity and sedentary behaviours from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: A systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2021;7:e000960.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Laddu DR, Lavie CJ, Phillips SA, Arena R. Physical activity for immunity protection: Inoculating populations with healthy living medicine in preparation for the next pandemic. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2021;64:102-4.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
da Silveira MP, da Silva Fagundes KK, Bizuti MR, Starck É, Rossi RC, de Resende E Silva DT. Physical exercise as a tool to help the immune system against COVID-19: An integrative review of the current literature. Clin Exp Med 2021;21:15-28.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Nigro E, Polito R, Alfieri A, Mancini A, Imperlini E, Elce A, et al. Molecular mechanisms involved in the positive effects of physical activity on coping with COVID-19. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020;120:2569-82.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wood CJ, Clow A, Hucklebridge F, Law R, Smyth N. Physical fitness and prior physical activity are both associated with less cortisol secretion during psychosocial stress. Anxiety Stress Coping 2018;31:135-45.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Arovah NI, Kushartanti BM. Moderate vigorous physical activity and clinical parameters in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Rom J Diabetes Nutr Metab Dis 2019;26:107-17.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Marques-Aleixo I, Santos-Alves E, Balça MM, Rizo-Roca D, Moreira PI, Oliveira PJ, et al. Physical exercise improves brain cortex and cerebellum mitochondrial bioenergetics and alters apoptotic, dynamic and auto (mito) phagy markers. Neuroscience 2015;301:480-95.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Simpson RJ, Kunz H, Agha N, Graff R. Exercise and the regulation of immune functions. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2015;135:355-80.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Arovah NI, Kushartanti BW. The acute effect of a moderate intensity ergocycle exercise on the coagulation parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A feasibility study. Clin Diabetol 2020;9:219-25.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Zheng Q, Cui G, Chen J, Gao H, Wei Y, Uede T, et al. Regular exercise enhances the immune response against microbial antigens through up-regulation of toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;37:735-46.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sallis R, Young DR, Tartof SY, Sallis JF, Sall J, Li Q, et al. Physical inactivity is associated with a higher risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes: A study in 48 440 adult patients. Br J Sports Med 2021;55:1099-105.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ghassab-Abdollahi N, Shakouri SK, Aghdam AT, Farshbaf-Khalili A, Abdolalipour S, Farshbaf-Khalili A. Association of quality of life with physical activity, depression, and demographic characteristics and its predictors among medical students. J Educ Health Promot 2020;9:147.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Rhodes RE, McEwan D, Rebar AL. Theories of physical activity behaviour change: A history and synthesis of approaches. Psychol Sport Exerc 2019;42:100-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Murray JM, Brennan SF, French DP, Patterson CC, Kee F, Hunter RF. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions in achieving behaviour change maintenance in young and middle aged adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2017;192:125-33.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Avery L, Flynn D, van Wersch A, Sniehotta FF, Trenell MI. Changing physical activity behavior in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral interventions. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2681-9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Qiu S, Cai X, Chen X, Yang B, Sun Z. Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med 2014;12:36.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Mirzaei A, Kazembeigi F, Kakaei H, Jalilian M, Mazloomi S, Nourmoradi H. Application of health belief model to predict COVID-19-preventive behaviors among a sample of Iranian adult population. J Educ Health Promot 2021;10:69.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Arceo E, Jurado JE, Cortez LA, Sibug N, Sarmiento GL, Lawingco AC, et al. Understanding COVID-19 preventive behavior: An application of the health belief model in the Philippine setting. J Educ Health Promot 2021;10:228.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R. Social cognitive theory. Predicting Health Behav 2005;2:127-69.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Young MD, Plotnikoff R, Collins C, Callister R, Morgan P. Social cognitive theory and physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2014;15:983-95.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Tison GH, Avram R, Kuhar P, Abreau S, Marcus GM, Pletcher MJ, et al. Worldwide effect of COVID-19 on physical activity: A descriptive study. Ann Intern Med 2020;173:767-70.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Armstrong T, Bull F. Development of the world health organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). J Public Health 2006;14:66-70.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): Nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Act Health 2009;6:790-804.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Champion VL, Skinner CS. The health belief model. In: Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Vol. 4. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco; 2008. p. 45-65.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 2011;17:268-74.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Bachtiar F, Utari D, Maharani FT, editors. Physical Activity Levels of Adults During Covid-19 Quarantine in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study. International Conference of Health Development COVID-19 and the Role of Healthcare Workers in the Industrial Era (ICHD 2020) Atlantis Press; 2020.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Masnarivan Y, Haq A, Putri AP, editors. Study of COVID-19 Prevention: Diet and Physical Activity During Large-Scale Social Restrictions in West Sumatera. International Conference of Health Development COVID-19 and the Role of Healthcare Workers in the Industrial Era (ICHD 2020) Atlantis Press; 2020.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Robinson E, Boyland E, Chisholm A, Harrold J, Maloney NG, Marty L, et al. Obesity, eating behavior and physical activity during COVID-19 lockdown: A study of UK adults. Appetite 2021;156:104853.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Gallo LA, Gallo TF, Young SL, Moritz KM, Akison LK. The impact of isolation measures due to COVID-19 on energy intake and physical activity levels in Australian university students. Nutrients 2020;12:1865.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Miljanovic Damjanovic V, Obradovic Salcin L, Zenic N, Foretic N, Liposek S. Identifying predictors of changes in physical activity level in adolescence: A prospective analysis in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:2573.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Lesser IA, Nienhuis CP. The impact of COVID-19 on physical activity behavior and well-being of Canadians. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:3899.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Plotnikoff RC, Costigan SA, Karunamuni N, Lubans DR. Social cognitive theories used to explain physical activity behavior in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2013;56:245-53.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
White SM, Wójcicki TR, McAuley E. Social cognitive influences on physical activity behavior in middle-aged and older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2012;67:18-26.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Ayotte BJ, Margrett JA, Hicks-Patrick J. Physical activity in middle-aged and young-old adults: The roles of self-efficacy, barriers, outcome expectancies, self-regulatory behaviors and social support. J Health Psychol 2010;15:173-85.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Sterdt E, Liersch S, Walter U. Correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents: A systematic review of reviews. Health Educ J 2014;73:72-89.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Zhang KM, Tulloch HE, Brunet J, Pipe AL, Reid RD, Prince SA, et al. What motivates nurses to exercise? Determinants of physical activity among Canadian nurses using self-determination theory. Ann Behav Med 2020;54:381-90.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Kaushal N, Keith N, Aguiñaga S, Hagger MS. Social cognition and socioecological predictors of home-based physical activity intentions, planning, and habits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Behav Sci (Basel) 2020;10:133.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Heukelum S. Physical Activity and Change in Vigorous Physical Activity during the COVID-19 Confinement in the Netherlands: Possible Associations with Perceived Vulnerability, Self-efficacy and Big-Five Personality Traits: University of Twente; 2020.  Back to cited text no. 51
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed270    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded108    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal