Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
Users Online: 837
Home Print this page Email this page

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 162

Neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners


1 Department of Physiology, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, Vir Chandra Singh Garhwali Government Institute of Medical Science and Research, Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India
3 Department of Physiology, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rachna Parashar
Department of Physiology, AIIMS, Bhopal - 462 024, Madhya Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_654_19

Rights and Permissions

INTRODUCTION: Different types of learners based on sensory modalities are observed. Cognition or physiological alterations in the sensory pathways might play its role in different modalities of visual, auditory, read and write, and kinesthetic learners which are based on different sensory modalities of perception OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to ascertain an objective parameter (neurophysiological parameters) for the classification of learners based on their preferred sensory modality MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 medical students. Learners were classified into visual, auditory, read-write, and kinesthetic learners based on the interpretation drawn on the basis of the VARK questionnaire. Sensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), including pattern shift visual (PSVEPs), brain stem auditory (BAEPs), short-latency somatosensory (SSEP), and event-related potentials (P300) were measured. SEPs measured in microvolts were recorded from the scalp with the help of active and reference electrodes. Multiple responses to sensory stimuli (using NIHON KOHDEN Corporation Neuropack X1, Tokyo, Japan) were recored and averaged using the computerized signal averging technique. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed in conduction velocities (in terms of latency and amplitude) of SEP among different type of learners, except latency N145 wave form in VEP (P < 0.05). A characteristic pattern of minimal comparative latency was observed among the majority of visual learners. Similary, P300 has shown a characteristic pattern of decreased comparative latency among majority of read and write learners. CONCLUSION: Study findings suggested that among existing teaching and learning modalities, visual modalities were observed faster but to retain it in memory and for abstract thinking, students should utilize read and writing skills which are lacking in the era of digitalization and overuse of electronic devices.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed488    
    Printed52    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded149    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal